Geographical analysis

Department of Geography & GIS

Article

Geographical analysis

Year: 2019, Volume: 8, Issue: 2, Pages: 70-75

Original Article

The Plight of Tribal Livelihood in the Context of Globalisation

Received Date:22 September 2019, Accepted Date:12 November 2019

Abstract

Most of the scheduled tribes live in rural areas, and their livelihood mainly depends on agriculture and forest. Forest and forest-based products remain as their primary resource subsistence. Their pattern of shifting cultivation replaced with settle farming. After the introduction of globalisation, the Indian economy opened its exports and imports to the global market. In the process, the intervention of non-tribal community to the tribal regions has become as one of the problematic policy issues to the traditional tribal communities. The traditional livelihood practices of the scheduled tribes in India affected due to extraction of natural resources. The state controls most of the natural resources that existed in the tribal regions without the consent of the local community. In the context of globalisation and its trajectories across the tribal regions, the current paper discusses how globalisation affects the traditional livelihood practices of the scheduled tribes in India.

Keywords: Tribal; Globalization; Forest

References

  1. Jhon K, Thomas. Tribal Development in India, Empowerment and Protection of the Rights of Tribals. Economic and Political Weekly. 2005;33(11):94–111.
  2. Suri KC. Political Economy of Agrarian Distress. Economic and Political Weekly. 2006;41(16):1523–1529.
  3. Bose NK. Culture and Society in India. Asia Publishing Company. 1967.
  4. Sinha S. Tribes and Indian Civilisation: Transformation process in modern India. Man in India. 1981;61(2):105–142.
  5. Peter MG, . The Current Status of World’s Hunting and Gathering Peoples. In: Lee RB, ID., eds. Man the Hunter. (pp. 13-22) Routledge. 1968.
  6. Suresh D. Tribal Development through Five Year Plans in India- An Overview. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2014;3(1):794–816.
  7. Kumar SC, . Tribal Land Alienation: Government's Role. Economic and Political Weekly. 2001;36(52):4791–4795.
  8. Guha R. Democrats and Dissenters. Gurgaon: Penguin. 2016.
  9. Dogra B. Tribal Discontent: Timely Warning. Economic and Political Weekly. 1990;25(14):710–712.
  10. Weiner M. The Political Economy of Industrial Growth in India. World Politics. 1986;38(4):596–610. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2010168
  11. Kumar SV, . Concept of ‘Tribe’ in the Draft National Tribal Policy. Economic and Political Weekly. 2008;43(50):29–35.
  12. Omvedt G. Capitalism and Globalisation, Dalits and Adivasis. Economic and Political Weekly. 2005;40(47):4881–4885.
  13. PR. 'Globalisation and Exclusion: The Indian Context. Global Asia. 2009;4(1):64–73.
  14. Doshi SL. Tribals: An Assimilationist Society and National Integration. In: KSS., ed. The Tribal Situation in India. (pp. 438-439) Indian Institute of Advanced Study. 1972.
  15. Government Of I. Ministry of Home Affairs. 1982.
  16. Halavath K, . Human Rights and Realities of Tribals’ Lives in India: A Perfect Storm. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 2014;19(4):43–46. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.9790/0837-19424346
  17. Vidyarthi LP. Problems and Prospects of Tribal Development in India. Indian Anthropologist. 1972;2(2):80–93.
  18. Shivani N. Globalisation and Socio-Economic Exclusion of Tribals in India. KCG- Journal of Social Sciences. 2013;1(6):1–6.
  19. Das V. Human Rights, Inhuman Wrongs-Plight of Tribals in Orissa. Economic and Political Weekly. 1998;33(11):571–562.
  20. Mishra B. People’s Movement at Kalinga Nagar: An Epitaph or Epitome? Economic and Political Weekly. 2006;41(7):551–554.
  21. Mohanty BB. Land Distribution among Scheduled Castes and Tribes. Economic and Political Weekly. 2001;36(40):3857–3868.
  22. Srinivas MN. Social Change in Modern India. New Delhi: Orient Longman. 2004.
  23. Rajamanickam M. Psychology of Tribal People. Authorspress. 2007.
  24. Sasidharan AA. Livelihood Transition: Socio-Cultural and Economic Impact on Tribal Life. Journal of Social Work Education and Practice. 2017;2(3):9–17.
  25. Wani M, Kothari A. Globalisation vs India’s Forests. Economic and Political Weekly. 2008;43(37):19–22.

Copyright

© 2019 Rao & Manasa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original author and source are credited. 

Published By Bangalore University, Bengaluru, Karnataka

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.