Geographical analysis

Department of Geography & GIS

Article

Geographical analysis

Year: 2021, Volume: 10, Issue: 1, Pages: 45-51

Original Article

Impact Analysis of Urbanization and Industrialization on Water Quality of Vrishabhavathi River

Received Date:11 February 2021, Accepted Date:25 May 2021

Abstract

The Arkavathi watershed, Bangalore Urban, and Ramanagara are all parts of the Vrishabhavathi River district. This River, a tributary of the River Arkavathi, which enters the River Cauvery, serves as the primary supply of surface water. It drains a major parts of Bangalore metropolis and is an outlet for domestic and industrial effluent of that area. It is an outlet for the domestic and industrial wastewater of the Bangalore metropolis and drains a sizable portion of the city. Previously, drinking and agriculture were the principal uses for this surface water. Because of the location of this watershed in both urban and rural Bangalore, this water is now solely used for unsafe agricultural purposes. The current study has been conducted to map the geographical variability of the surface water quality in the watershed in order to assess the surface water quality. The results and analysis showed that most sampling sites’ water quality is not suitable for drinking water purposes. It is also limited to the usage of other activities because of the degradation of water quality. The Nitrate content is high in a few of the groundwater samples collected. The bicarbonate content is more in all the samples. The study, therefore, emphasized the need for periodic monitoring of water levels, the management of industrial effluents before discharge into the river, and the introduction of appropriate mitigation strategies to resolve problems and deterioration to facilitate the safe state of the river. Only 40 percent of the industries have got the facility to treat wastewater. They have installed Effluent Treatment Plant (ETP).

 

Keywords: Industrial effluent, Wastewater, Water quality, Contamination

References

  1. Longley PA, Goodchild MF, Maguire DJ, Rhind DW. Geographical information systems: Principles, techniques, applications and management. New York. Wiley. 1999.
  2. Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. 2004.
  3. Wartenberg D. Screening for lead exposure using a geographic information systemEnvironmental Research1992;59(2):310317.
  4. Lakoff G. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago. University of Chicago Press. 1987.
  5. Inc E. ERDAS User's Guide. 1999.
  6. Deren LI, Kaichang DI, Deyi LI. Land Use Classification of Remote Sensing . 2000.
  7. Anselin L. Interactive techniques and exploratory spatial data analysis. In: Longley PA, Goodchild MF, Maguire DJ, Rhind DW., eds. Geographical information systems: Principles, techniques, applications and management. (pp. 253-266Wiley. 1999.
  8. Joseph G, . Fundamentals of Remote Sensing. 2003.
  9. Burrough PA. Principles of geographical information systems for land resources assessmentGeocarto International1986;1(3):54.
  10. Briggs DJ. Mapping environmental exposure. In: Elliot P, Cuzick J, English D, Stern R., eds. Geographical and environmental epidemiology: Methods for small-area studies. (pp. 158-176Oxford University Press. 1992.
  11. Heywood I, Cornelius S, Carver S. An Introduction to GIS. 2004.

Copyright

©  2021 Surendra & Saurabh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Published By Bangalore University, Bengaluru, Karnataka

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.