Geographical analysis

Department of Geography & GIS

Article

Geographical analysis

Year: 2025, Volume: 14, Issue: 2, Pages: 70-77

Original Article

Assessing the Impact of Waterlogging and Soil Salinity Problems on Land Productivity and Crops Production in Central Haryana

Received Date:16 February 2025, Accepted Date:22 December 2025

Abstract

Waterlogging and soil salinity are severe challenges to agricultural productivity in Central Haryana. This study evaluates the spatial and temporal changes in waterlogging and salinity for the years 2010 and 2019-20, analyzing their impacts on land productivity and crop yields. Remote sensing data from LANDSAT 7 and 8 were employed to map affected areas using NDWI and NDSI indices. Geospatial analysis was complemented by a survey of 1,050 farmers, which provided insights into crop patterns, yield reductions, and economic losses due to these issues. The results revealed that waterlogging affected 14,091 hectares during the pre-monsoon season in 2010, increasing to 63,446 hectares post-monsoon. By 2019-20, waterlogged areas reduced to 13,480 hectares pre-monsoon and 44,159 hectares post-monsoon. Conversely, salinity levels increased significantly, particularly in moderately and strongly saline categories. The economic impact is considerable, with an annual estimated loss of ₹490 million, primarily due to reduced yields of key crops such as wheat, rice, and cotton. Factors contributing to these problems include excessive irrigation, canal seepage, poor drainage systems, and unregulated groundwater extraction. The study underscores the need for sustainable solutions such as subsurface drainage, efficient irrigation practices, and crop diversification. Policymakers and stakeholders must prioritize these interventions to mitigate waterlogging and salinity, ensuring sustainable agricultural practices and enhancing the livelihoods of farmers. By integrating advanced geospatial techniques with ground-level surveys, this research offers a comprehensive framework for addressing land degradation challenges in similar agro-climatic regions.

Keywords: Waterlogging, Salinity, Land Productivity, Crop Production, RS, GIS

References

1. Abbas A, Khan S. Using remote sensing techniques for appraisal of irrigated soil salinity. Proceeding in International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (Modsim 07), UK, Dated-Dec, 2007, pp. 2632-2638

2. 2. Bakker DM, Hamilton GJ, Hetherington, Spann C. Productivity of waterlogged and salt-affected land in a Mediterranean climate using bed-furrow systems. Field Crops Research. 2010; 117 (1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.01.009

3. Barrett-Lennard EG. The interaction between waterlogging and salinity in higher plants: causes, consequences and implications. Plant and Soil. 2003; 253 (1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024574622669

4. Dwivedi RS, Sreenivas K, Raman KV. Inventory of salt-affected soils and waterlogged areas: A remote sensing approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 1999; 20 (8). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/014311699212623

5. Gama PBS, Inagana S, Tanaka K, Nakazawa R. (2007). Physiological response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seedlings to salinity stress. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2, 79–88.

6. Gautam AM. Application of IRS-1A data for delineating buried channels in Southern part of Allahabad district of Uttar Pradesh. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing. 1990; 18 (3). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03030733

7. Hossain MA, Uddin SN. (2011). Mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance in wheat: morphological and metabolic adaptations under hypoxia or anoxia. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5, 1094–1101.

8. Kumar S. (2017), Geospatial techniques based geomorphological mapping in Fatehabad district. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT). Vol 5(4), pp. 3780-3788

9. Kumar S. (2018), Monitoring Gangotri glacier using remote sensing and GIS technique, International Journal of Engineering Research in Computer Science and Engineering (IJERCSE), Vol. 5(1), pp. 21-25

10. Kumar S. Remote sensing and GIS based groundwater prospects and quality assessment in Fatehabad district, Haryana. i-manager’s Journal on Future Engineering and Technology. 2018; 14 (1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.26634/jfet.14.1.15255

11. Kumar S, Kumar G. (2019), Role of Geospatial application in waterlogging and salinity assessment: A review, Our Heritage, Vol. 67(4), pp. 1-10

12. Linkemer G, Board JE, Musgrave ME. Waterlogging Effects on Growth and Yield Components in Late‐Planted Soybean. Crop Science. 1998; 38 (6). Available from: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183x003800060028x

13. Lone AA, Khan MH, Dar ZA, Wani SH. (2018). Breeding strategies for improving growth and yield under waterlogging conditions in maize: a review. Maydica 61:11.

14. Major DJ, Baret F, Guyot G. A ratio vegetation index adjusted sor soil brightness. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 1990; 11 (5). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169008955053

15. Markad NR, Kale AA, Pawar BD. (2014). Molecular characterization of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) genotypes in relation to salt tolerance. The Bioscan, 9(4), 1785–1788.

16. Mohamedin AAM, Awaas MS, Ahmed AR. (2010), The negative role of soil salinity and waterlogging on crop productivity in the north eastern region of the Nile Delta, Egypt, Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Science, Vol. 6 (4), pp. 378-385

17. Pannell DJ, Ewing MA. Managing secondary dryland salinity: Options and challenges. Agricultural Water Management. 2006; 80 (1-3). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.003

18. Setter TL, Waters I. Review of prospects for germplasm improvement for waterlogging tolerance in wheat, barley and oats. Plant and Soil. 2003; 253 (1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024573305997

19. Setter TL, Waters I, Sharma SK, Singh KN, Kulshreshtha N, Yaduvanshi NPS, et al. Review of wheat improvement for waterlogging tolerance in Australia and India: the importance of anaerobiosis and element toxicities associated with different soils. Annals of Botany. 2009; 103 (2). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn137

20. Shabala S. Physiological and cellular aspects of phytotoxicity tolerance in plants: the role of membrane transporters and implications for crop breeding for waterlogging tolerance. New Phytologist. 2011; 190 (2). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03575.x

21. Singh R. Re-envisioning Remote Sensing Applications. 2021; 1st ed. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003049210

22. Singh S. (2013), “Waterlogging and its effect on cropping pattern and crop productivity in south west Punjab: A case study of Muktsar district”, Journal of Economic & Social Development, Vol. IX (1), pp. 71-80, Vol. 117, pp. 24-37, doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.01.009

23. Singh S, Singh R. Geo-spatial topology based morphometric analysis for soil and water conservation in Dholbaha watershed of Kandi region. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020; 1531 (1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1531/1/012087

24. UNDP/FAO (1985), Studies for the use of saline water in command areas of irrigation projects, Haryana, Technical report A.G.: DP/IND/81/010

25. Zeng F, Shabala L, Zhou M, Zhang G, Shabala S. Barley responses to combined waterlogging and salinity stress: separating effects of oxygen deprivation and elemental toxicity. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2013; 4 Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00313

26. Zhu JK. Plant salt tolerance. Trends in Plant Science. 2001; 6 (2). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1360-1385(00)01838-0

Copyright

© 2025 Kumar & Singh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Published By Bangalore University, Bengaluru, Karnataka

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.